Subversion of the subversives

Are they not subversives? 

How else do you term the bunch of people who do nothing but undermine the Government of the day through half truths, lies, deception and politics of hatred?

The latest revelation of the details of our Scorpene submarine deal, that reduced Suaram to a spineless political tool, is one classic example. That linking the late Altantuya to the submarine deal and then directly to the Prime Minister and his wife is more than sinister. It is, in my opinion, a clear cut act of subversion.

Not sinister, but deliberate attempts at stoking anger and hatred against the Government of the day by extensive fabrication and blatant lies. 

The facts state otherwise but the minds of the people have been poisoned for far too long. Propaganda was at its best but the messages were blatant lies. It is subversion. The damage is done.

See what Wikipedia says about SUBVERSION. 
Subversion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the political concept of subversion. For other uses, see Subversion (disambiguation).

Subversion refers to an attempt to transform the established social order and its structures of power, authority, and hierarchy. Subversion (Latin subvertere: overthrow) refers to a process by which the values and principles of a system in place, are contradicted or reversed *. More specifically, subversion can be described as an attack on the public morale and, “the will to resist intervention are the products of combined political and social or class loyalties which are usually attached to national symbols. Following penetration, and parallel with the forced disintegration of political and social institutions of the state, these loyalties may be detached and transferred to the political or ideological cause of the aggressor.” [1] Subversion is used as a tool to achieve political goals because it generally carries less risk, cost, and difficulty as opposed to open belligerency. Furthermore, it is a relatively cheap form of warfare that does not require large amounts of training.[2] A subversive is something or someone carrying the potential for some degree of subversion. In this context, a "subversive" is sometimes called a "traitor" with respect to (and usually by) the government in power. Terrorist groups generally do not employ subversion as a tool to achieve their goals. Subversion is a manpower intensive strategy and many groups lack the manpower and political and social connections to carry out subversive activities.[3] However, actions taken by terrorists may have a subversive effect on society. Subversion can imply the use of insidious, dishonest, monetary, or violent methods to bring about such change. More HERE

The Government of the day must act, decisively against such new methods employed by subversive elements in the society. This is not politics and it is not healthy.

While the ghost of Altantuya is back to haunt those liars, we may also consider a more sober perspective to the loads of propaganda that followed the late Teoh Beng Hock's death. 

Who was Teoh Beng Hock and why was he being investigated by the MACC in the first place? 
Remember how those subversives were working round the clock undermining the Government? They even paraded TBH's family and his fiancee during political ceramahs and byelection campaigns. What was the purpose, motive or intention?

Who will deny that they were fanning anger and hatred against selected institutions and the Government of the day? 

This is not politics. Its not even clean. It is subversion.

...mmm possible

Attempted 'murder' of PDRM

There are many familiar faces in this video. One of them is Suaram' Executive Director Nalini Ellumalai who blatantly blames the Royal Malaysian Police for murder. 

Nalini shouts her heart out in this video - "Ini adalah satu pembunuhan, betul? Pembunuhan ini berterusan dan tidak berhenti, betul? Kalau dia (C.Sugumaran) seorang yang mempunyai heart attack kenapa you gari dia? It's obvious ini adalah satu pembunuhan" 

A group of very familiar Pakatan Rakyat politicians like N.Surendran , Lateefa Koya, Manikavasagam and their lackeys staged this political drama outside the Federal Police Headquarters in Bukit Aman purportedly to protest the death of security guard C.Sugumaran who collapsed and died after police handcuffed him on a roadside in Kajang recently. 

C.Sugumaran did not die in police custody (as in lock-up) but collapsed and never regained consciousness after being handcuffed at the scene. The deceased (with a history of mental illness) had earlier ran amok and destroyed public property. (according to initial police statement and eye witness account)

Selangor Police have proposed for an inquest to investigate the death of C.Sugumaran following attempts by Pakatan Rakyat politicians to manipulate Sugumaran's death for political mileage but these same Pakatan Rakyat politicians have denounced the proposed inquest without any justification.

Well if its true that C.Sugumaran was beaten to death by the two policemen who apprehended him with the help of members of the public, the duo must face the full brunt of the law. But what if all those wild allegations hurled by these Pakatan Rakyat politicians and their lackeys like Nalini are mere fabrication?

How could you, Nalini, say that this is a murder (pembunuhan)? Were you there at the scene witnessing this pembunuhan? 

Another Pakatan Rakyat politician who hurls blatant allegations against PDRM in the video above is M.Ravi - the PKR state assemblyman for Port Dickson. 


Ravi, speaking before a banner with Sugumaran's dead body with PKR flag superimposed on it, says "Polis ini licenced killer! 

Well, maybe its time for the police to act. Investigations into Sugumaran's death must not leave any stones unturned. 

But PDRM and the Home Ministry must also initiate immediate action against politicians and their lackeys who make blatant accusations of 'murder' and 'lisenced killer' without any basis. 

Forget about politics and political considerations, that is none of your business in this matter. This is about upholding a 'Royal' institution that has become a favourite target of politicians.

I believe the two policemen who rushed to the scene to detain a unstable man who was running amok on the streets of Kajang on that day have their rights too. PDRM too should stand up for their rights or risk being ridiculed by desperate politicians and their lackeys.

p/s Nalini, your 'spin' that police was wrong to handcuff a man who suffers from heart problems sucks. Your insinuation that the policemen knew Sugumaran had heart problems or heart attack, thus shouldn't have handcuffed him speaks volumes of your level of intelligence and/or desperation.

Muslim Spring against the US, a Jewish play by Soros?

Its an anti-American Muslim Spring - sweeping through Middle East and spreading to the African continent. 


This anti-American uprisings are in fact building up all around the world with growing protests and condemnation following Israeli Jew filmmaker Sam Bacile's controversial movie that reportedly insults Islam and Prophet Muhammad.

"The two-hour movie, "Innocence of Muslims," cost $5 million to make and was financed with the help of more than 100 Jewish donors, said Bacile, who wrote and directed it.

Bacile, a California real estate developer who identifies himself as an Israeli Jew, said he believes the movie will help his native land by exposing Islam's flaws to the world."

So, an Israeli Jew who is an American citizen has claimed credit for the movie which triggered this latest Arab Spring against Americans.

Just concerned if rogue Jewish currency trader George Soros, who funds anti-government NGOs in Malaysia, had also funded this controversial movie against Islam and Prophet Muhammad.

Soros is known to have bankrolled many Jewish filmmakers in the past, quite a number of them bent on wiping out Islam and Muslims from the face of earth.

Muslims too are often portrayed as terrorists in such Jew-funded/directed movies.

This may just be another of the rogue manipulator's ways of destabilising the Muslim world... creating a volatile atmosphere where he could ply his trade. Never mind all the mess and lost of innocent lives. 

His eyes would most certainly be fixed on the Presidential elections too.

The Arab Spring against Americans is spiraling out of control and would soon transform into a Muslim Spring. 

 A Muslim Spring would once again pit Islam against the rest of the world, and the proxies would fight the battle for their master. 

Is Georgy Soros the paymaster? 

p/s Wonder if Suaram people are also into movie-making now, after their long drawn no-its-not-me drama.